Tees Valley Health Scrutiny Joint Committee Minutes

Tees Valley Health Scrutiny Joint Committee Minutes

Date:
Monday 23 April 2012
Time:
10:00 a.m.
Place:
Mandela Room, Town Hall, Middlesbrough
 

Attendance Details

Present:

Representing Darlington Borough Council:
Councillors Newall (Vice-Chair) (In the Chair) J Taylor and Mrs H Scott

Representing Middlesbrough Council:
Councillor Cole, Dryden (Chair) and Mrs H Pearson

Representing Redcar & Cleveland Council:
Councillors Kay and Mrs Wall

Representing Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council:
Councillor Mrs M Womphrey.

Officers:
A Metcalfe (Darlington Borough Council), E Hind (Hartlepool Borough Council), J Bennington and J Ord (Middlesbrough Council) and P Mennear (Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council).
Apologies for absence:
were submitted on behalf of the Chair, Councillor Dryden for his unavoidable delay at the commencement of the meeting (Middlesbrough Council), Councillors S Akers-Belcher, Griffin and G Lilley (Hartlepool Borough Council), Councillor Carling (Redcar & Cleveland Council) and Councillor Javed (Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council).
Declarations of interest:
Name of Member Type of Interest Item/Nature of Interest
Councillor Mrs Wall Personal/Non Prejudicial Any matters arising in respect of the North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust -related to a number of employees
Item Number Item/Resolution
PUBLIC
11/944 MINUTES

The minutes of the meeting of the Tees Valley Health Scrutiny Joint Committee held on 26 March 2012 were submitted and approved as a correct record.

11/945 MATTERS ARISING - LOCAL HEALTH AND WELLBEING BOARDS

Following the meeting of the Joint Committee held on 26 March 2012 confirmation was given that a letter from the Chair and Vice-Chair on behalf of the Joint Committee had been forwarded to each Chief Executive of the Tees Valley Authorities outlining key points raised by Members. Such issues included the importance of establishing the extent to which Health and Wellbeing Boards were working with each other and also the suggestion for the creation of an appropriate forum at which items of shared interest and unified positions could be discussed.

 

AGREED that the information provided be noted.

11/946 WINTER PRESSURES - NHS TEES

The Scrutiny Support Officer submitted a report the purpose of which was to introduce senior representatives from the local NHS to provide an update on the impact of Winter Pressures on local health services during the 2011/2012 winter period.

 

In order to assist deliberations a series of questions had previously been forwarded to the local NHS representatives which focussed on how the local NHS coped with winter pressures, resilience of processes, lessons learnt, involvement of emerging Clinical Commissioning groups and uptake of vaccinations amongst ‘at risk’ groups and staff.

 

The Chair welcomed senior representatives from NHS Tees who highlighted the key points as demonstrated in a PowerPoint presentation provided to the Joint Committee.

 

In general and in the national and local context for the winter period 2011/2012 there had been very low influenza incidence after a relatively mild winter and good weather conditions. The Joint Committee was advised however of very high incidence of diarrhoea and vomiting and Norovirus across the North East and UK. As a result there had been staff pressures in Community Hospitals (South Tees). Additional funding had been provided to North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust and South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust to open ‘winter beds’. It was also confirmed that County Durham and Darlington Foundation Trust had received extra funding and that a winter debrief session on the outcome of the winter period would be held on 23 April 2012.

 

The Joint Committee was advised that in overall terms the local NHS had coped well with winter pressures during the 2011/2012 winter. Daily sitreps and reporting had ceased on 10 April 2012. Members were advised however of hotspots which included such areas as:-

 

(a) Vaccination uptake - at risk groups and staff;
(b) Delayed transfers of care identified early on and examined on a case by case basis and recognition that one of the main reasons for this had been capital repair work being undertaken at Carter Bequest Hospital which had impacted on the availability of beds;
(c) Norovirus/diarrhoea and vomiting;
(d) A & E capacity in busy periods;
(e) Bed capacity/ward closures;
(f) Trusts mutual aid/ambulance policies across the North East had been implemented when necessary and had worked well.

 

In terms of lessons learnt it was acknowledged that there had been a high uptake in the level of staff vaccination. It was recognised that there was a need to ensure that provider NEEP plans were consistent across the system which would aid mutual support. The need to get Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCG) aware and on board with such issues was acknowledged.

 

The involvement of the emerging CCGs with inter planning/winter resilience included invitation/attendance at Tees Urgent Care System Group since summer 2011; attendance at ‘winter’ update weekly to Executive Team/CCG Leads meeting; invitation to SHA 2011/2012 Winter Debrief; and Local Medical Committee involvement.

 

Statistical information was provided on the uptake figures for vaccinations amongst 65 year olds, ‘at risk’ groups, pregnant women; and amongst staff.

 

The NHS target for many years had been a threshold of 70% which the Tees Valley areas had all exceeded. Of particular note was Redcar & Cleveland achieving 78.5% and Middlesbrough at 76.3%. Members were advised that the figures in relation to the ‘at risk’ groups were generally higher than in previous years most of which were around 50%. In relation to the uptake amongst pregnant women Members referred to concerns which had been raised regarding the safety aspects of taking such vaccines. In response, the Joint Committee was given an assurance that work would continue with GPs and midwives regarding the safety in taking such vaccines.

 

In overall terms the uptake rates amongst staff was reported to be higher than in previous years. It was reported that for the North Tees and Hartlepool NHS FT it had been 75.4% the sixth highest across the Northern Region. It was reported that for the Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS FT it had been 51.2%, for South Tees Hospitals NHS FT 50.8% and for County Durham and Darlington NHS FT 49.9%. The Joint Committee noted that the highest uptake of 88.6% had been Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen NHS FT and the lowest at 29.4% had been the North East Ambulance Service FT.

 

An indication was given that arrangements would be put in place to cope with ‘pressure’ in relation to the Olympic Games including the local torch processions.

 

In response to Members’ comments regarding the high level of uptake amongst staff at North Tees and Hartlepool NHS FT and the benefits of sharing information on lessons learnt it was confirmed that the level achieved had been acknowledged and a presentation was to be given to other North East providers. Members suggested that it would be helpful if such information was made available to the individual health scrutiny committees. As part of the measures to increase awareness, reference was made to the importance of focussing on the benefits of the vaccine to the staff themselves and to the patients/services users around them.

 

Given the nature of the work undertaken Members expressed concerns at the comparatively low take-up by the North East Ambulance Service NHS FT. It was pointed out that the spread of staff across the region and shift patterns were factors which impacted on the take-up of vaccinations.

 

Members referred to the professional network which existed which provided a systematic approach as to when particular issues arose. Clarification was sought as to what the future arrangements would be in such circumstances. Although it was noted that steps were being taken to ensure every contingency plan was in place it was too early to determine if such action would be effective. Specific reference was made to the important role of scrutiny through the transition period and in the future such as requesting information of future and outcome of winter plans. An indication was also given of the functions of various bodies such as Public Health England, Health Protection Agency, Health and Wellbeing Boards and NHS Commissioning Board. It was acknowledged that Clinical Commissioning Groups needed to be clear as to the development of their structure and commissioning support arrangements. An indication was given of various meetings to which CCGs had been invited to attend such as those with the PCTs and an event with the Strategic Health Authority to be held on 11 May.

 

AGREED as follows:-

 

1. That the senior representatives of NHS Tees be thanked for the information provided which was noted.

 

2. That a letter from the Chair and Vice-Chair on behalf of the Joint Committee be forwarded to the North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust regarding the low take-up of the flu vaccine and any action they propose to take to address the matter.

 

3. That a further update on seasonal flu and winter preparedness be provided in due course.


 

11/947 OPERATING FRAMEWORK 2012/2013

A report of the Scrutiny Support Officer was submitted which outlined the outcome of the Joint Committee’s consideration of the NHS Operating Framework in respect of 2012/2013. The Joint Committee had received evidence from Tees, Esk & Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, North East Ambulance Services NHS Foundation Trust, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and the County Durham & Darlington NHS Foundation Trust at its meetings held on 30 January and 27 February 2012.

 

The Scrutiny Support Officer reported upon a letter recently received from the Cluster Chief Executive, NHS North of England in response to a letter forwarded on behalf of the Joint Committee regarding the future arrangements for commissioning ambulance services.

 

It was confirmed that the North East Ambulance Service contract in future would be commissioned by a lead Clinical Commissioning Group working on behalf of the other CCGs in the North East. It was pointed out that this would be a similar arrangement to that which had existed in the North East since 2006 whereby all PCTs contributed to the contract design but with one PCT taking the lead on behalf of the others.

 

AGREED as follows:-

 

1. That the report be noted and approved.

 

2. That the Tees Valley Health Scrutiny Joint Committee considers the issues raised relating to the NHS Operating Framework when considering its future work programme/areas of interest.

 

11/948 CHILD AND ADOLESCENT MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE LEARNING DISABILITIES -SHORT BREAK SERVICES FOR TEESSIDE

The Scrutiny Support Officer submitted a report the purpose of which was to introduce representatives from Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council, Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council, and NHS Tees to update the Joint Committee on the current situation relating to access to short break services as outlined in Appendix 1 of the report submitted and in an update previously circulated.

 

Members were reminded of proposals for the temporary relocation of short break accommodation owing to the unsuitability of accommodation for children and young people in Stockton (Piper Knowle House) and Redcar & Cleveland (179 Normanby Road) to the Baysdale Unit on the Roseberry Park site, Middlesbrough as an interim solution.

 

Since the interim service had been established in March 2011, ongoing discussion had taken place with the PCT and legal advice sought from both Stockton Borough Council and the PCT regarding the funding of the travel arrangements as outlined in the report.

 

During such ongoing discussions the PCT, Stockton Borough Council and Redcar & Cleveland Council had continued to ensure transport was provided to the young people the costs of which had been covered on a joint funded basis. Historically, where the children had accessed the respite services in their home local authority, the School Transport Service would collect the young people from school and transport them to the respite service and the following morning collect them from the Unit and take them to school. This had been ‘custom and practice’ for many years and did not incur any additional costs as such children were eligible for school transport and were being transported within the Borough on agreed school transport routes. During school holiday periods parents made their own arrangements for transporting children to the Unit. Since the children now accessed service outside the Borough there were inevitable costs details of which were outlined in the report.

 

In the light of legal advice from the respective organisations agreement was being sought to consult with parents on proposals to cease providing transport to the health respite unit with effect from September 2012. It was confirmed that NHS Tees and the local authorities would also continue to explore other funding arrangements to resolve the transport issues.

 

In terms of the letter to be forwarded to parents an assurance was given that such documentation gave details of a named individual to contact should they require clarification or any further information.

 

AGREED as follows:-

 

1. That the representatives be thanked for the information provided.

 

2. That a further update be provided to the Joint Committee including details on the feedback from parents on the proposal and possible options for the long term solution in providing short-break accommodation on Teesside for children with complex needs.


 

Powered by E-GENDA from Associated Knowledge Systems Ltd